
This is a long post with a more substantial reflection on the church, than what I normally do on this blogsite. There are a few times when this post begins to take on the quality of one of my Rant and Rave posts. No apologies. I am passionate about the church.
I also thought about doing a "re-write" to tone some stuff down. It is not my intention to hurt anyone. But I do want to speak strongly in the midst of a conversation where I experience the critics speaking very strongly.
Let me run a few questions by you.
MARRIAGE
Why is marriage in trouble in the USA today?
Why are people quitting marriage in such large numbers?
HEALTH CARE
What is wrong with the health care system?
What can we do about it...what should we do about it?
GOVERNMENT
Why are so many people so cynical and pessimistic about the government?
Why are so many people just giving up on expecting true change from great political leadership?
How can we change their viewpoint to they are excited once again about the government?
Or should we just bail and sit on the sidelines and gripe and complain?
For the three issues mentioned above - here are a few more questions.
How simple or how complex do you think those issues are?
How simple or how complex do you think the perspectives, answers, proposed solutions will be?
I think the issues are extremely complex and the answers are just as complex.
THE CHURCH...
Why are the Faithful Leaving?
What Can We Do About It?
These are the two big questions Julia Duin raises and answers. I am not satisfied with her assessment or her answers.
What follows is a pretty strong criticism of Duin's highly critical book.
Of her ten chapters, eight of them are focused on specific issues: Church is irrelevant, it is not providing community, it is not culturally engaged, singles are not welcome or helped, teaching is weak, the pastor is the problem, women don't have a true voice, and the Spirit of God is not showing up. In these eight chapters, you can find another 40 or so complaints listed. (And I agree with many of our criticisms about the church. They are true for some churches at some times.)
Also, please understand that Julia Duin is one who has quit the church. For Duin, the "leavers" are blameless "with very few exceptions." (pp. 177). I am sure she includes herself as one of the blameless. She has left the church and it is the church's fault. The church is just not meeting the needs of people or her own needs. That language recurs over and over through her book.
I grew a little weary of this whining about "my needs aren't being met." I also grew a little skeptical about the "not my fault" mentality that was looking for the herd of "leave takers" to confirm her choice.
I almost despaired thinking about how to write a post(s) in response to the endless specifics with which I disagree. Then the next day I read a book by two authors who (in essence) did a far better job than I could do (although there are definitely things they say which I think are inadequate or misguided). The book is Why We Love the Church. I'll have a few comments about that in another post.
Here is why I don't value Duin's contribution.
She quit, she complains, and she assesses blame as wholly elsewhere and on the other! I have been in enough counseling situations, enough church conflict situations, enough messy leadership scenarios to know -- there is always more than one side to the story... and that one person, one party, one position NEVER has all the blame. A little more self-awareness and humility on Duin's part would have been nice.
If you quit and bail -- you lose the right to criticize on what you've quit. Sorry, that is just the way it is. On anything.
If you want to criticize, then hang in there. Do the hard work of love. Okay, so you've been hurt. WHO HASN"T BEEN HURT? You've been disappointed and let down! Join the club called humanity.
You think you can do church better. Than do it. Do it for about ten years and then tell us how you did it. But along the way, here is what I think you will find. You aren't going to do a very good job at it. You will hurt people. You'll disappoint them. You'll let them down. You won't meet their needs. And they will criticize you at every step. And they will QUIT on you. They will take their leave of you and they will put all the blame on you.
Please stop with the banal answers of - be more relevant. Be more loving. Have more community. Have better teaching. Do a better job of leading. As if we don't know this already. As if thousands of us are not trying to do these very things. As if we haven't learned a few things along the way. And as if there are not multiple ways forward.
Oh yes... one more thing. Please give up on the naive idea that the "House Church" is the answer. Lots of us know it isn't. It is just as hard as any other "form" or "method" or "style" of church. Here is what we are going to see in about 5 years. Books titled:
Why I Quit My House Church: My Needs Weren't Being Met.
Disillusioned with the House Church: Memoirs of a Post-Emergent Pagan.
Help for Those Hurt by Dysfunctional House Church Leaders
If You Thought Big Church Was Bad... Why I Left the House Church Movement
The house church already has problems with mission, teaching, community, and leadership.
Imagine this scenario. Thousands of untrained leaders. Not trained in understanding the Bible. Not trained in teaching or facilitating. Not trained in processing relational conflict. Not trained in leadership. Not trained in missional outreach. Not trained in the spiritual disciplines. Not trained in much at all. And now they are a "new kind of leader for a new kind of church." Where do I sign up? (Sarcasm intended.)
Oh wait. We've already had that situation. It was/is known as the small group movement.
Today the small group movement just got a lot sexier and edgier by taking the name "House Church." Wonderful! But a poorly led, poorly taught, poorly nurtured, poorly missional group is going to be a mess whether you call it a small group, a House Church, or Revolutionary Cell, or Christian Coven (sorry, more sarcasm playing around with those who play around with the idea of Pagan Christianity) or whatever you decide to name it.
And this is only going to get worse, not better. I can share some personal anecdotes of my own on this as well. Some from years ago and some from last month. I've heard plenty of anecdotes from people who have left a house church which they described as deeply dysfunctional, bad leadership, lousy teaching, ingrown, not missional, etc. Hmmm. That sounds familiar. I guess human nature erupts in small groups as well as large ones.
By the way, for the record, I have no problems with House Church as one more method, way, strategy for doing church in our time. I do have a problem with utopian views about the house church. I do have a problem thinking it is THE way to do church.
*****************
Okay, there are real issues in the church. Lots of them. There are real problems. These issues and problems are very complex. We mess up a lot. We fall terribly short so often. There are many, many nuances in every issue. There are always multiple reasons for every problem. There are always about as many perspectives on an issue-problem as there are people involved.
And we need to do something about the problems.
Here is what I am left with.
Jesus loved the church. I am pretty sure that Jesus still loves the church. Jesus has not Quit on the church. I am also pretty sure that Jesus wants us to love the church also. Jesus, because he doesn't quit on the church and because he sacrificially loves the church, has the right to criticize and rebuke his church (for an illustration of this read Revelation 2 and 3). I'd like to suggest that we be about the imitation of Christ on this. That means, do not Quit, Bail, Leave, Flee, or Abandon... If it gets that bad, then you have the opportunity to practice loving your enemy. Go for it and see what God does in you even if he does little around you. (Note: In a later post, I'll address the fact that renewal of broken systems sometimes means going outside the system and starting something new.)
The New Testament church was a very messy affair. All you have to do is read Paul's letters and you see that it has always been this way. For Paul, the church was worth fighting for, praying for, suffering for, dying for. And he did. He loved the church as did his Savior. Paul was always committed to the imitation of Christ.
I have been tempted more than once to quit, to bail, to throw in the towel. I've been hurt too. I've been misunderstood, taken advantage of, criticized, not appreciated, not had my needs met...
And in all of this, Jesus brings me back to the great goal and outcome of our faith, which has never ceased to be...
Love the Lord your God with all your heart, soul, mind and spirit. And love your neighbor as yourself. Some of those neighbors are church people.
Love one another. By this, all people will know you are my followers. I am pretty sure that no exegetical gymnastics is going to be able to translate the word love as Quit on one another.
Love is patient and kind... love always hopes and always perseveres. (i.e. Love does not Quit.)
Love doesn't quit and complain from the sidelines. Love engages, love suffers, love sacrifices, love redeems...
So I've stayed the course, prayed for grace and healing. Recognized my own sin and shortcomings as well those of the "other." I've become a little more humble along the way. A bit more grateful. And certainly more dependent on mercy and forgiveness. (And still grumbled way too much... but tried to do it under my breath.)
The church that Jesus died for is not a church we want to Quit on.
And finally... (to mercifully end this way to long post on a semi-humorous note)
. . . here is one creative, marketing appeal for church...
The only problem is, when you join it, it may begin to...
Sorry... had to get that one in.
Brian "a very great sinner who needs the Church" Rice
Leadership ConneXtions International
www.lci.typepad.com